Skip to content

AI Recommendation Standings / archive

AI agent frameworks: October 2026

The final October 2026 standings for “What framework should I use to build AI agents?”. These numbers are fixed and can be cited by permalink. See the current standings.

View as Markdown

AI share of voice · October 2026

440 sampled answers · 9 models

  1. 1AutoGen▲ 0.30.3%
    Claude Opus 4.8—
  2. 2CrewAI▲ 0.30.3%
    Claude Opus 4.8—
  3. 3LangChain▲ 0.30.3%
    Claude Opus 4.8—
  4. 4LangGraph▲ 0.30.3%
    Claude Opus 4.8· quiet
  5. 5LlamaIndex▲ 0.30.3%
    Claude Opus 4.8—
  6. 6Pydantic AI±00%
    not named this month—

Share of voice weights each compared model equally: it is the average, across the models, of how often each one named the tool in its own answers, so a model probed more than another can't skew it. Model chips list which AI models named it this month; the pulse is the sentiment of that month's developer mentions across Hacker News, Reddit, GitHub, Stack Overflow, Bluesky and more.

Quotable · copy freely

Averaged equally across 9 AI models, AutoGen is named in 0.3% of answers about ai agent frameworks (1 of 9 name it).
Source: BackTalk AI Recommendation Standings, October 2026 · backtalk.sh/ai-recommends/ai-agent-frameworks/2026-10
The 3 prompts behind these standings
  • ›What framework should I use to build AI agents? (recommendation)
  • ›What are the best LangChain alternatives? (alternatives)
  • ›Which framework is best for building an LLM app? (recommendation)

Each prompt is sampled several times per model per probe because answers vary run to run; 440 answers across 5 probe runs fed this month.